Missive of Retired Judges to the CJI is unjustified

 

Sometimes extraordinary measures need to be adopted to deal with an extraordinary situation. The manner in which the peace was being hijacked by some rioters in different places of Uttar Pradesh after the Friday prayers in mosques was highly disturbing for the common people. There could be no room for any doubt that it was being planned by some and executed by namazis. Yogi government has restored the peace sooner than it was expected by administering the ‘bulldozer medicine’. The preliminary revelations have made it clear that the vicious radical PFI has been responsible for the state-wide trouble.

But what is more troublesome is the letter of some former judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts and some advocates to the Chief Justice of India requesting him to take suo motu cognizance of the use of bulldozers to stop the razing of the houses of the rioters. As far as the identification of culprits is concerned, nobody is expected to know better than them that real culprits mostly go scot-free, and it takes years to bring them to book. And yet if these worthies want to frustrate the steps of the government, it is not difficult to infer their real intentions. In fact, it has been the legitimate expectation of the general public that they should have used their influence in asking the rioters to adopt the peaceful means to register their protests.

The country has seen innumerable sits-in and demonstrations. Such peaceful protests and agitations have mostly been supported by the people but the pelting of stones on shops and others in the manner it was being done by the extremists/terrorists of Kashmir can never be endorsed. The way this letter petition has been written by the judges appears that letter writers are inclined to save rogues and rascals. Dharnas of Anna Hazare at Jantar Mantar a few years ago and many candle marches were taken out at India Gate, particularly for the justice to Nirbhaya and it got nationwide support. But when one sees the crowd of namazis coming out of the mosques and throwing stones at shops and damaging public property one shudders to think of their violence. Traders close their shops due to the fear of the namazis.

Some judges have the misconceived notion of being monarchs, and they can pass orders as per their whims. The fact is that constitution does not give any such whimsical powers to judges. Only two years ago a former Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court had ordered to remove the posters bearing the photographs of those who were to be found out as they were suspected to be responsible for creating trouble in Lucknow during Anti-CAA protests. His order was patently wrong, but the Executive had no choice but to comply with it. Everybody was aghast as to why the judge, who has since retired, was overreaching his jurisdiction and behaving in a bizarre manner, which was totally unbecoming of the post that he held.

Lawlessness cannot be allowed to rob the peace of millions of citizens of the state. These judges have, no doubt, written the letter to the Hon’ble CJI for cheap publicity. If they were so concerned with the rule of law, they should have asked the Executive to tactfully handle the situation and at the same time appealed to namazis not to take the law into their own hands.

Arun Shouri’s Latest Tome is Worthless Through and Through

Arun Shourie’s latest book ‘The Commissioner for Lost Causes’ is absolutely boring and insipid, and it does not enlighten in any manner whatsoever. It is an account of the self-righteousness of Arun Shourie. Let it be said that it has unfortunately now become a new trend or fashion for most of the journalist-writers to tom-tom about themselves. In the book, Shourie has reproduced long reports from newspapers, official files or the letters that he had written earlier to buttress his own conclusions. In some places, he has praised Ram Nath Goenka, the owner of the Indian Express Group of newspapers but at many times he has traduced him in his book. Ram Nath Goenka was called RNG by his well-wishers and admirers, however, for workers he was always Lalaji. In the eyes of Shourie, he was intrepid, fearless and courageous till he subserved the interests of this self-styled thinker. But when RNG started reining him in, Shourie brought forth his all demerits of an actor, of being uncouth and ugly behaviour, of being abusive and vulgar. Needless to say, it was RNG and his newspaper Indian Express which made Arun Shourie a famous person by allowing him to shine and swell his image among the politicians and bureaucrats.  Lalaji was never a lily-white person, his activities like most of the other businessmen were shady, whose all works were aimed at making a profit of all types, yet he was many times very magnanimous towards those employees, editors included, who were ready to perform the duties of a personal factotum.   

This is a bulky book by Arun Shourie containing nearly six hundred solid pages and has as many as 29 chapters but the crux of almost the entire book is the self-glorification or self-eulogy of the writer. The credit must certainly be given to a person like Shourie, who despite no training or experience in journalism, managed to be foisted as a senior /executive editor on a dedicated team of journalists by virtue of being a member of the elite club of the Lutyens Delhi. He was brought to the Indian Express because of his proximity and high connections with powerful people. Lala ji gave him full freedom to publish lengthy reports taken directly from the official files. Some of them were passed on to him by Lallaji himself and some of them were obtained from his own sources. Those reports might not have been able to any interest to the common people, but they were enough to set the government(s) on fire.  Shourie has also had the knack of appropriating the stories of his own reporters, which got his ego massaged.

Arun Shourie has painted Lala ji with a black brush time and again in the book, but Lalaji was no less clever than him. He also used Arun Shourie as a hack, wherever it was needed. Lalaji used to shower choicest abuses on his adversaries and editors, as was his wont, and Shourie has reproduced them as they were hurled. Shourie’s selfishness to outshine other senior editors and journalists by becoming the eyes and ears of Lalaji is clearly visible in all the chapters.

Arun Shourie has always been anti-worker. He has discussed the two strikes of workers: one in Bombay (now Mumbai), which was organised under the leadership of the late Dr Datta Samant and the other in Delhi in the year 1987. He has not discussed at all the working conditions or the demands of the employees but has made all-out efforts to blame the strikers. During both the strikes, Shourie played the role of a shameless strike breaker. What could be more reprehensible for a so-called intellectual like Shourie to invest his time and energy in breaking the strikes than suggesting any respectable solution? He identified fifth columnists among journalists who were/are dime a dozen and black sheep among workers by luring them with various blandishments. He has taken umbrage that why the employees of other newspapers came forward to help the striking workers of Indian Workers in Delhi. This shows the colossal ignorance of the person about the Trade Unions, where the unity of other workers is not only fully justified but the real Mantra of the movement.

Lo and behold! Shourie after being kicked from the shop of the Lalaji developed his proximity with politicians but feigns ignorance about the shenanigans of politics. He tries to his readers to believe that the Membership of the Rajya Sabha was given to him on a platter, although he was reluctant to accept it. His description of the offer, election to the Rajya Sabha and later the ministership is economical with the truth.

 Shourie has praised the judiciary and the judges only when it suited him. So long judiciary and the judges helped him and Lalaji in achieving their goals, they were alright but when it did not suit, he did not hesitate in turning against them. Lalaji and Shourie virtually converted their newspaper into a journalistic harlotry and a tool of blackmailing. Anybody who went against them, be it a worker, a journalist, a politician or a trade unionist was tarred with a bad name so as to hang him/her with heaps of ignominy.

Just as Rajiv Gandhi was brought to heels on the issue of Bofors guns with the help of some politicians, Arun Shourie and his ilk tried to blackmail Narendra Modi by using the Rafael fighter planes to get the pounds of flesh. But Arun Shourie and his cohorts like Prashant Bhushan and Yashwant Sinha had to eat humble pie as they did not get support from anywhere. Arun Shourie and his company forgot that Narendra Modi was made of different mettle, who cannot be blackmailed because of his squeaky-clean politics. That is the reason Shourie, and others got rebuffed by the judiciary and the CAG. Now Arun Shourie’s words are taken with a pinch of salt because his true colours have been known to everybody.

 Coming again about the book, it will be a sheer waste of time in going through this worthless tome.  The book is an example of hollowness. It looks like the writer is unaware of the fact that self-praise is no recommendation.

 

 

 

Violence After Prayers Stinks of Obnoxious Conspiracy

 

Stone pelting after the Juma Namaz (Friday Prayers) at various places in the country amply demonstrates that some forces, which are inimical to India are actively engaged in hatching a conspiracy to shatter the peace and harmony. This is being done in the name of opposing Nupur Sharma. Demonstrations and gheraos are legitimate rights of the people in our country. Even for peaceful dharna and pradarshan permission from the police is necessary but in such types of orchestrated violence police and other citizens are attacked by Namazis. It is generally believed that after the Namaz, devotees would turn to peaceful self-introspection but here they become violent and target police and the public by pelting stones. This could not have been a spontaneous incident as it happened simultaneously at many places. This was a well-thought plan, which is clear from the fact that stones could not be collected on the spur of the moment. Therefore, to maintain law and order and to restore the confidence of the people, Imams and other members of the Intzamia(managing) committee should be immediately rounded up if the crowd turns violent. The lectures, which are delivered by Maulanas after the Namz should be fully monitored and if something provocative is found then apart from rioters these Maulvis should also be held responsible.

The irony is that such anti-social elements get open support from a lobby that claims to be liberal, and the champion of freedom of speech and expression. This lobby has unfortunately been helping anarchy. One is amazed at the mentality of some people who derive perverted pleasure and gleefully tell others that Muslim countries are very unhappy with the present Modi government. They allege that the present Indian government has not been able to keep in check those who speak against Islam. There cannot be any grudge against Islamic countries because they have no idea of democracy and debate but why do our own people, who swear by dissent and discussion feel happy to be associated with them? Is it not strange that these people prefer to go with medievalism? It is all the more, strange that those who consider religion as an opium of the masses do not have any compunction in siding with those, who vehemently refuse to listen to the truth even if it is written in their own scriptures. Here it is not the question of Muslims, who refuse to see any logic in the name of faith but about those perverts who revel in the expansion and encroachment of Indian territory by China. If the relationship of India nosedives with Arabian countries and the diesel and petrol prices get hiked, they feel happy because they get the opportunity to traduce the government, which is not of their liking. Anything that embarrasses the present government will be a good stick for these nincompoops. But they do not know that under the cover of Modi's opposition they are doing incalculable damage to the country.

India has always had a very healthy tradition of discussing and disagreeing with any proposition, even if a person is high and mighty. Kabir Das has been the biggest iconoclast that the country has seen in the last five hundred years. One shudders to think that what would have been the fate of Kabir Das if he had been alive today. After all, Nupur Sharma did not say anything which could be said to be a figment of her imagination. She simply quoted from the Hadis, which no cleric has been able to refute. So, why this intolerance? Are we returning to the age of darkness, where even facts can't be stated or told in the name of faith? Clearly, it is against the democratic, constitutional and even religious spirit of the country. The law-enforcing agencies will, therefore, have to take the help of technology to deal with such elements, who erupt into violent activities on the day of the religious congregations. But apart from the law enforcement agencies, the awaked section of the society will have to also come off their shells to create an atmosphere of discussion and debate free from rancour and animosity.

Like

Comment

Share

Suspension of Nupur Sharma Shows the Sign of Imbecility

 

One wonders why some intellectuals in India and some governments of tiny Islamic countries are up in arms over what Nupur Sharma said in a TV debate. She might have naturally gotten infuriated over the extreme provocation by some panellists over Shivlingfound at Gyanvapi of Varanasi but what she had said about Prophet is fully countenanced by the Islamic scriptures. She even quoted the source of what she said. But what is strange is that instead of providing any logical reply to what she said, some people started blaming her for blasphemy. 

 Imam Mohammad Al- Bukhari is considered to be one of the most distinguished scholars of Hadith in Islamic history. His book Sahih al-Bukhari contains the words, actions, and habits of Prophet Mohammad. This book says that the ProphetMohammad married Aisha when she was six years old, and he consummated his marriage when she was nine-year-old.   Many people think that the Arab world got annoyed with India for what with she said in the TV debate. But why should they matter to India? They are not even worth two pennies. However, if BJP succumbed to the pressure of Arabian countries to take action against Nupur Sharma, then nothing can be more shameful. So, the earlier her suspension is revoked the better for the image of the government and also of the party that rules the country.

A large country like ours is not expected to bow down to the pressure of these insignificant Arabian countries. Who cares for these two-penny Arabian countries? The USA has been openly helping and supporting Israel in the teeth of opposition from these Arabian countries and they have not been able to shake even a hair of America. China has been bashing and pounding Uighur Muslims for the last many years, but these countries have not mustered the courage to even open their mouth against repressive China.  

  Even today in the twenty-first century the Arabian countries are characterised by scientific illiteracy, retrogressive mentality, and medieval backwardness. Their displeasure, therefore, should be dismissed with the contempt that they deserve. One is aghast to learn that even in this time when the invention and miracle of the internet have taken the world by storm, how can a section of society in the world subscribe, nay, boast of living in the age of caves?

Nobody can be kept shackled with outdated and primitive ideas in modern times. Thus, if the BJP wants itself to be saved from public ridicule, it must not only revoke the suspension of Nupur Sharma but also help promote the openness of ideas. It will be the moment of remorse and mea-culpa for theParty and the government.  Why and how law and order are thrown to the wind by a section of society at short intervals is another issue of deep concern and consideration for the government of the day.

What has happened at Kanpur a few days after the suspension of Nupur Sharma shows that it was a well thought out conspiracy and planning. The conspirators must be found out and a long-term policy is prepared so that the fangs of the anti-social elements are crushed before they could rise again.

Debate and Dissent cannot be throttled in the Name of Faith

     It is reported that communal violence broke out in Kanpur as some people after offering Namaz in a mosque started pelting stones at shops in the locality to protest against the assertions of BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma about Prophet Mohammad in a TV debate. They say it is blasphemy to speak against the Prophet Mohammad even if it is based on the proofs of their own scriptures, thus leaving no scope for any discourse or dialogue. Many FIRs have also been lodged against her under sections 295A, 153A and 505B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)at many places for what she has said.

  Ms Sharma alleges that she has been receiving death and rape threats on social media after a "so-called fact-checker" circulated a heavily edited video from one of her recent debates on a TV channel on the Gyanvapi case. Be that as it may, the most perplexing question is why should a healthy debate be not allowed even in the first quarter of the twenty-first century and why the Maulvis are not issuing their firmans against those, who have become so intolerant? After all, what she has spoken about Prophet Mohammad is also based on some books and those sources cannot be dismissed in the name of faith. It is all the more surprising that when it is ordained that what Prophet Mohammad had said or done should be followed by his true followers, then why his preaching and activities should not be seen with microscopic subtility?

  In the name of faith, the reasoning and logic cannot be given go by, that too, at a time when the revolutionary changes have taken place, thanks due mainly to science and technology. After knowing the full facts about any one or all religions, if anybody wants to renounce the same to become an atheist, why should there be any bar on him or her? If any Muslim or a Christian has to say logically and factually something about Ram, Krishna or Shiva or any Hindu deity, there cannot be any objection to it by any Hindu. After all, Shastras (arguments) based on correct information are the basic ingredients to convince anybody to follow any religion.

 Swami Dayanand Saraswati had always fought against superstitions in all religions. Sanatani Hindus were his worst critics. He did not spare Christianity, Islam or any other sects of Hindu religion. He was respected rather revered for his razor-sharp mind and deep erudition. He had thrown an open challenge to any preacher, priest or cleric to prove him but those who always thrived on superstitions did not come forward to face him. Why the clerics and Maulvis are not coming forward to openly denounce such persons, who are abusing, trolling or threatening Nupur Sharma for what she has said?  They should prove with all politeness that what she has said is not based on facts. She must also be prepared to rectify the mistakes if it is proven on scriptural evidence.

 But the way, Nupur Sharma is being intimidated has no place in any civilised society. The Courts and the Administration must deal with such persons with iron hands, who want to foreclose all debates and discussions in the name of religious beliefs. Such stupidities and puerilities by some people cannot be allowed to suppress and suffocate the voice of dissent and logic. If it were so, then the great thinkers like Charvak, Heraclitus, Nietzsche, Karl Marx and the whole hosts of atheists across the globe would have been exterminated after opening their mouths.