It submitted its report on 14th
July 1954. It made two very important recommendations; one was the enactment of
the Working Journalist Act and the other was for the statutory Press Council of
India. The Working Journalist Act was enacted in 1955 within a few months of
the submission of the Press Commission's report but the Press Council of
India came into existence on 16th November 1966. In those days only
the Print medium was in existence. In the name of electronic medium, the government-controlled Akashvani was there but that had nothing to do either with the
Working Journalist Act or with the Press Council of India. There was no freedom
for Akahvani, it had and even now it has to work as per the policies
framed by the government
To cut a long story short in this
year's celebration of National Press Day, the Vice President of India Jagdeep
Dhankhar was the guest of honour, who exhorted the Press Council by saying that
it was not 'the time to show teeth but a time to bite against those spreading
the fake and false news. And the bite must be strong because those who are
serving with high ethical standards must be encouraged only by those not doing
so being visited with exemplary consequences.’
Dhankhar also said that it was the moral
duty of the media to tell the truth, nothing but the truth. He cited a recent
incident about a newspaper in Telangana publishing that the V-P’s Twitter
handle carries a fake photograph of a parliamentary committee. He also cited
another incident from the past, when as Governor of West Bengal, he suffered
when a senior journalist alleged, he was summoning the Chief Minister of West
Bengal to Raj Bhavan every day.
What is, however, very surprising is that
Dhankhar is asking the Press Council not to show its teeth but to bite
strongly. It appears that he is blissfully ignorant about the fact that the
Press Council of India is a toothless tiger. It has no teeth at all. It can
only put moral pressure on the newspapers by either, warning, reprimanding or
censuring the erring newspapers or journalists. It has no powers beyond that.
It may be stated here that yours truly was also a member of the Press
Council for two consecutive terms i.e., for six years. He and his organisation
Indian Federation of Working Journalist (IFWJ) has been demanding a complete
overhauling of the Press Council of India.
The first thing that needs to be done is that
the Press Council should be converted into the Media Council by the Parliament
of Bharat by bringing all genres of media that are Print, Electronic, Web,
Digital and social media into its ambit. Then it would be in a position to take
note of the errors of all types of media. The second most important thing is
that it should have enough powers to take stringent action against the erring
defaulters otherwise nobody will care even two hoots for its directions/ orders/
suggestions.
The other thing that should be done is to
have eminent journalists, trade unionists, literature and law apart from
Members of Parliament and other social activists of honesty
and credibility in the Press Council. But at present there is hardly any
important journalist, who is a member of the Press Council.
The biggest crisis that the country is
facing today is that of the credibility of media and this can be restored only
when the Media Council possesses some powers. It should not only have the teeth
to show but strong enough to bite the errants. Today the biggest
problem comes from social media, which often indulges in deep fakery with the
help of new technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI). The crisis of
credibility is more because, social media, operates without any gatekeepers. The
expression ‘fake news’ has never been heard so loudly before as it is these
days and social media is the main sinner.
No comments:
Post a Comment